Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅ |
Contributor
|
You added a new test case in the middle of an existing test case. Please fix that and make CI pass, and a repository owner/collaborator might take a look. Also, edit your initial post to say "# Fixes 21030" without quotes in the post body (not the title). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR ensures that decorators applied to a TypedDict class definition are correctly analyzed for undefined names.
Previously, the semantic analyzer's special-case handling for TypedDict (analyze_typeddict_classdef) was returning early without visiting the decorators list in the ClassDef. This caused mypy to silently ignore invalid names, attributes, or subscripted expressions used as decorators on these classes.